We begin studying Module B after we have finished our Area of Study.
Most classes will study Shakespeare's Hamlet
Ms Butcher's class will study Speeches: Board of Studies website: www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au Margaret Atwood – ‘Spotty-Handed Villainesses’, 1994 Paul Keating – ‘Funeral Service of the Unknown Australian Soldier’, 1993 Noel Pearson – ‘An Australian History for Us All’, 1996 Aung San Suu Kyi – ‘Keynote Address at the Beijing World Conference on Women’, 1995 Faith Bandler –‘Faith, Hope and Reconciliation’, 1999 Deane, William – ‘It is Still Winter at Home’, 1999 Anwar Sadat – Speech to the Israeli Knesset, 1977
You should ensure that you are familiar with these texts by the time you arrive back from the holidays. For students studying Hamlet, make sure you have read the text and watched at least one DVD of the play.
From p. 20 English Stage 6 Prescriptions Module B: Critical Study of Texts This module requires students to engage with and develop an informed personal understanding of their prescribed text. Through critical analysis and evaluation of its language, content and construction, students will develop an appreciation of the textual integrity of their prescribed text. They refine their own understanding and interpretations of the prescribed text and critically consider these in the light of the perspectives of others. Students explore how context influences their own and others’ responses to the text and how the text has been received and valued.
Developing an informed personal response What is ‘an informed personal understanding’ of a text’?
your own interpretation/reading of a text which is constructed from critical analysis and evaluation of language, content and construction
What does ‘critical analysis and evaluation’ mean?
making judgments about a text based on careful and considered appraisal of its qualities
What is textual integrity? “The unity of a text; its coherent use of form and language to produce an integrated whole in terms of meaning and value.” (p145 Syllabus)
the wholeness or soundness of a text
look for patterns in the text
Textual integrity can be implied in comments such as: -The way Shakespeare develops the idea of death brings closure to the plot of Hamlet. -Ondaatje privileges the voice of the minority culture in his novel by using multiple narratives thus his structure reinforces his central idea. -Shakespeare uses his subplot to support the events of the main plot. -The puppet metaphor cleverly imagines Ondaatje’s concern that the migrants were silenced by the dominant culture. -Images of death and decay are utilised throughout Hamlet, working to reinforce Hamlet’s world as disordered and corrupt. -Ondaatje frequently associates the symbolism of light in the novel with the women in Patrick’s life, signifying the hope that love and connection give him. How can you refine your ‘own understanding and interpretation of the prescribed text and critically consider these in the light of the perspectives of others’?
Test your reading against what other readers say
Use what others say to reinforce, broaden or challenge your reading
Others’ perspectives can include a director of a film version or play, a critic, or someone else you know who has made a considered reading of the text.
How does context influence your response to the text and how the text has been received and valued by others? What you are doing when you interpret the text is ascribing value (relevance/ importance/the meaning derived) to it. A text can be valued (found to be relevant/meaningful) in so many different ways, by different readers, in differing contexts. A feminist critic would place value on the representation of women in a text, whereas a post-colonial reading privileges (values) the voice of the minor colonised culture. The value that you attribute to the text is affected by different contextual influences. The way we read a text, the meaning we derive from it and the value we ascribe to it are influenced by established ways of thinking about some aspects of the world and our cultural contexts (D Eldridge). Pulling this together: So, what I do in this module is think… This is how I value the text but my understanding of it can be broadened or challenged by considering the perspectives of others who are reading the text or ascribing value to it from a different position or context. So…key questions to ask yourself when preparing your reading: 1.What is the text really about (for me)? What makes it so tragic or so meaningful, for instance? A good place to start is the key ideas. 2.Why do I respond to it in this way? After all, a feminist responds to In the Skin of a Lion in a certain way because she/he is a feminist. What is your reason? What about your world (immediate and global) positions you to respond to the text in this way? 3.How is my response different to the way a Shakespearean audience would have responded? Explain your reasons. 4.What characters and central ideas could I use to support an explanation of my reading? 5.What scenes/episodes should I address to support my reading? Specific explanations of the narrative, quotes. 6.What dramatic or narrative conventions are used in these to influence the way I respond to the text? Play close attention to narrative or dramatic patterns here as they help you to understand the main ideas in the text. 7.How can I broaden my understanding of the text (my reading) by testing it against the way others interpret it? 8.What is the real purpose of my reading? What am I trying to prove about the text and the way it can be valued/appreciated/understood?
Preparing your reading:
1.What is the text really about (for me)? What makes it universal, valuable or transcendent? Because….
2.What about your world/context (immediate and global) positions you to respond to the text in this way?
3.How is my response different to the way others around me may respond? …….. thinks that the text is………….. ……..context influences him/her in that……..
4.What characters and central ideas could I use to support an explanation of my reading?
5.What scenes/episodes/chapters should I address to support my reading? Specific explanations of the narrative, quotes.
6.What dramatic or narrative conventions are used in these to influence the way I respond to the text? Pay close attention to narrative or dramatic patterns here as they help you to understand the main ideas in the text. I can evaluate textual integrity by ……
7.Who can I use to inform my reading? (Could be critical, extensive research, film for Shakespeare) After I read/listened to…..I found that…..reinforces my reading because….. The director of……privileges…..and that informs my reading because….. The critic……broadened……
8.What is the real purpose of my reading? What am I trying to prove about the text and the way it can be valued/appreciated/understood?
Readings of Hamlet that we have seen students accomplish 1.Hamlet holds universal value because it highlights the individual’s need to find truth and meaning in what can appear to be a meaningless world 2....it highlights the conflict between ambition and conscience 3....it is a coming of age play as the protagonist contemplates his place in changing world 4....it emphasises our innate struggle between reason and passion... 5....it is a play about isolation and loneliness.... 6....is a play about a man incapable of acting because he thinks too much ...and some further suggestions: 7.Hamlet is a play about the inadequacy and impotency of sensitivity in the face of the demands of action. (Adapted from the introduction to New Cambridge version) 8.Those who understand are loath to act. They realise that no action of theirs can work any change in the eternal conditions of things, and they regard an assertion as ludicrous or debasing that they should set right the time which is now out of joint. Understanding kills action. This, essentially, is Hamlet’s predicament. (Adapted from Nietzsche) Or, a variation on number 8, also adapted from Nietzsche:
9.Understanding can kill action; in order to act we require the veil of illusion. It is not reflection but understanding which debars actions; ‘the apprehension of truth and its terror’. The truth once seen, man is aware everywhere of the ghastly absurdity of existence. Herein is Hamlet’s essential problem. 10.Hamlet is the embodiment of a very special human wisdom caught between two opposing forces which were trying to complete themselves. The one force is seen in a murderous takeover of the kingdom; the other in a cry for revenge. Hamlet’s wisdom baffles both alternatives. (John Masefield)
Module B
We begin studying Module B after we have finished our Area of Study.
Most classes will study Shakespeare's Hamlet
Ms Butcher's class will study Speeches: Board of Studies website: www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.auMargaret Atwood – ‘Spotty-Handed Villainesses’, 1994
Paul Keating – ‘Funeral Service of the Unknown Australian Soldier’, 1993
Noel Pearson – ‘An Australian History for Us All’, 1996
Aung San Suu Kyi – ‘Keynote Address at the Beijing World Conference on Women’, 1995
Faith Bandler –‘Faith, Hope and Reconciliation’, 1999
Deane, William – ‘It is Still Winter at Home’, 1999
Anwar Sadat – Speech to the Israeli Knesset, 1977
You should ensure that you are familiar with these texts by the time you arrive back from the holidays. For students studying Hamlet, make sure you have read the text and watched at least one DVD of the play.
Module B: Critical Study of Texts
This module requires students to engage with and develop an informed personal understanding of their prescribed text. Through critical analysis and evaluation of its language, content and construction, students will develop an appreciation of the textual integrity of their prescribed text. They refine their own understanding and interpretations of the prescribed text and critically consider these in the light of the perspectives of others. Students explore how context influences their own and others’ responses to the text and how the text has been received and valued.
Developing an informed personal response
What is ‘an informed personal understanding’ of a text’?
What does ‘critical analysis and evaluation’ mean?
What is textual integrity?
“The unity of a text; its coherent use of form and language to produce an integrated whole in terms of meaning and value.” (p145 Syllabus)
Textual integrity can be implied in comments such as: -The way Shakespeare develops the idea of death brings closure to the plot of Hamlet. -Ondaatje privileges the voice of the minority culture in his novel by using multiple narratives thus his structure reinforces his central idea. -Shakespeare uses his subplot to support the events of the main plot. -The puppet metaphor cleverly imagines Ondaatje’s concern that the migrants were silenced by the dominant culture. -Images of death and decay are utilised throughout Hamlet, working to reinforce Hamlet’s world as disordered and corrupt. -Ondaatje frequently associates the symbolism of light in the novel with the women in Patrick’s life, signifying the hope that love and connection give him.
How can you refine your ‘own understanding and interpretation of the prescribed text and critically consider these in the light of the perspectives of others’?
How does context influence your response to the text and how the text has been received and valued by others?
What you are doing when you interpret the text is ascribing value (relevance/ importance/the meaning derived) to it. A text can be valued (found to be relevant/meaningful) in so many different ways, by different readers, in differing contexts. A feminist critic would place value on the representation of women in a text, whereas a post-colonial reading privileges (values) the voice of the minor colonised culture. The value that you attribute to the text is affected by different contextual influences. The way we read a text, the meaning we derive from it and the value we ascribe to it are influenced by established ways of thinking about some aspects of the world and our cultural contexts (D Eldridge).
Pulling this together: So, what I do in this module is think…
This is how I value the text but my understanding of it can be broadened or challenged by considering the perspectives of others who are reading the text or ascribing value to it from a different position or context.
So…key questions to ask yourself when preparing your reading:
1.What is the text really about (for me)? What makes it so tragic or so meaningful, for instance? A good place to start is the key ideas. 2.Why do I respond to it in this way? After all, a feminist responds to In the Skin of a Lion in a certain way because she/he is a feminist. What is your reason? What about your world (immediate and global) positions you to respond to the text in this way?
3.How is my response different to the way a Shakespearean audience would have responded? Explain your reasons.
4.What characters and central ideas could I use to support an explanation of my reading?
5.What scenes/episodes should I address to support my reading? Specific explanations of the narrative, quotes.
6.What dramatic or narrative conventions are used in these to influence the way I respond to the text? Play close attention to narrative or dramatic patterns here as they help you to understand the main ideas in the text.
7.How can I broaden my understanding of the text (my reading) by testing it against the way others interpret it?
8.What is the real purpose of my reading? What am I trying to prove about the text and the way it can be valued/appreciated/understood?
Preparing your reading:
Because….
……..context influences him/her in that……..
I can evaluate textual integrity by ……
The director of……privileges…..and that informs my reading because…..
The critic……broadened……
Readings of Hamlet that we have seen students accomplish 1.Hamlet holds universal value because it highlights the individual’s need to find truth and meaning in what can appear to be a meaningless world 2....it highlights the conflict between ambition and conscience 3....it is a coming of age play as the protagonist contemplates his place in changing world 4....it emphasises our innate struggle between reason and passion... 5....it is a play about isolation and loneliness.... 6....is a play about a man incapable of acting because he thinks too much ...and some further suggestions: 7.Hamlet is a play about the inadequacy and impotency of sensitivity in the face of the demands of action. (Adapted from the introduction to New Cambridge version) 8.Those who understand are loath to act. They realise that no action of theirs can work any change in the eternal conditions of things, and they regard an assertion as ludicrous or debasing that they should set right the time which is now out of joint. Understanding kills action. This, essentially, is Hamlet’s predicament. (Adapted from Nietzsche)
Or, a variation on number 8, also adapted from Nietzsche:
9.Understanding can kill action; in order to act we require the veil of illusion. It is not reflection but understanding which debars actions; ‘the apprehension of truth and its terror’. The truth once seen, man is aware everywhere of the ghastly absurdity of existence. Herein is Hamlet’s essential problem. 10.Hamlet is the embodiment of a very special human wisdom caught between two opposing forces which were trying to complete themselves. The one force is seen in a murderous takeover of the kingdom; the other in a cry for revenge. Hamlet’s wisdom baffles both alternatives. (John Masefield)